Formerly of Los Alamos
A former Professor of Anthropology, now at Arizona State University School of Human Evolution and Social Change, wrote a chapter in the book Caring Economics: Conversations On Altruism And Compassion. “Altruism Reconsidered”, Professor Joan Silk called it.
She chaired a discussion in the book that compared human gratitude and our “…ability to grasp long-term implications of one’s actions” with that of animals. The discussion, which included the Dalai Lama, took place in 2010 at a conference in Zurich on Altruism and Compassion in Economic Systems.
Silk’s group began with a look at the word altruism. She stated that it is common in animals. It is seen in their natural behavior, and is somehow related to genetic fitness, the ability to survive and reproduce. More social animals seem to survive than nonsocial ones. In humans, even more so in apes, altruism seems to be limited to members of one’s group.
However, the Dalai Lama added that “…with the help of intelligence, compassion can be enhanced.”
Silk suggests that flexibility distinguishes humans from animals, who run primarily on genetic programming. I’m not so sure. The Dalai Lama countered that it’s our long-sighted or holistic view that allows us to be more compassionate, that “…care for each other is biologically essential for our survival.” Isn’t that true for animals, also?
My several decades of experience with the Hen House gang suggest that domestic birds can express concern for each other. They all gathered around turkey when she died, and they stayed there to tell me about it, hovering noisily over her quiet body lying in the Hen House doorway.
My duck Ms. Campbell came running from the nest one morning, obviously distressed, quacking loudly at me. I found that one chick had died in the…